Final Magnetic Moment18.996 μBCalculated total magnetic moment for the unit cell within the magnetic ordering provided (see below). Typically accurate to the second digit. |
Magnetic OrderingFiM |
Formation Energy / Atom-1.776 eVCalculated formation energy from the elements normalized to per atom in the unit cell. |
Energy Above Hull / Atom0.078 eVThe energy of decomposition of this material into the set of most stable materials at this chemical composition, in eV/atom. Stability is tested against all potential chemical combinations that result in the material's composition. For example, a Co2O3 structure would be tested for decomposition against other Co2O3 structures, against Co and O2 mixtures, and against CoO and O2 mixtures. |
Density4.51 g/cm3The calculated bulk crystalline density, typically underestimated due calculated cell volumes overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%) |
Decomposes ToLi11Mn13O32 + Li2MnO3 + Li4MnCo5O12 + Fe2O3 + O2 |
Band Gap0.000 eVIn general, band gaps computed with common exchange-correlation functionals such as the LDA and GGA are severely underestimated. Typically the disagreement is reported to be ~50% in the literature. Some internal testing by the Materials Project supports these statements; typically, we find that band gaps are underestimated by ~40%. We additionally find that several known insulators are predicted to be metallic. |
Hermann MauguinP1 [1] |
HallP 1 |
Point Group1 |
Crystal Systemtriclinic |
Calculated powder diffraction pattern; note that peak spacings may be affected due to inaccuracies in calculated cell volume, which is typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)
substrate material | substrate orientation | film orientation | MCIA† [Å2] |
---|---|---|---|
LaAlO3 (mp-2920) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 348.0 |
AlN (mp-661) | <1 0 1> | <1 1 1> | 122.5 |
AlN (mp-661) | <1 1 0> | <1 1 1> | 245.0 |
GaAs (mp-2534) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 232.0 |
BaF2 (mp-1029) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 203.0 |
GaN (mp-804) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 116.0 |
GaN (mp-804) | <1 0 1> | <0 1 0> | 325.5 |
GaN (mp-804) | <1 1 0> | <0 1 0> | 325.5 |
GaN (mp-804) | <1 1 1> | <0 1 0> | 325.5 |
SiO2 (mp-6930) | <1 0 0> | <1 -1 0> | 281.9 |
DyScO3 (mp-31120) | <1 1 0> | <0 1 0> | 325.5 |
KTaO3 (mp-3614) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 145.0 |
KTaO3 (mp-3614) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 116.0 |
KTaO3 (mp-3614) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 29.0 |
AlN (mp-661) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 261.0 |
AlN (mp-661) | <1 0 0> | <1 -1 0> | 94.0 |
AlN (mp-661) | <1 1 1> | <1 1 1> | 306.3 |
CdS (mp-672) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 203.0 |
CdS (mp-672) | <1 0 0> | <0 1 0> | 325.5 |
CdS (mp-672) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 348.0 |
CeO2 (mp-20194) | <1 1 0> | <1 1 1> | 306.3 |
CeO2 (mp-20194) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 203.0 |
GaAs (mp-2534) | <1 0 0> | <0 1 0> | 162.7 |
LiF (mp-1138) | <1 0 0> | <0 1 0> | 162.7 |
LiF (mp-1138) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 116.0 |
LiF (mp-1138) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 29.0 |
GaN (mp-804) | <1 0 0> | <0 1 1> | 307.3 |
SiO2 (mp-6930) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 87.0 |
SiO2 (mp-6930) | <1 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 145.0 |
KCl (mp-23193) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 203.0 |
DyScO3 (mp-31120) | <0 0 1> | <0 1 0> | 217.0 |
DyScO3 (mp-31120) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 232.0 |
InAs (mp-20305) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 203.0 |
ZnSe (mp-1190) | <1 0 0> | <0 1 0> | 162.7 |
ZnSe (mp-1190) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 232.0 |
YVO4 (mp-19133) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 261.0 |
YVO4 (mp-19133) | <1 0 1> | <0 1 0> | 271.2 |
YVO4 (mp-19133) | <1 1 0> | <1 -1 0> | 187.9 |
TePb (mp-19717) | <1 1 0> | <1 -1 0> | 187.9 |
Te2Mo (mp-602) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 203.0 |
Ag (mp-124) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 87.0 |
Ag (mp-124) | <1 1 0> | <1 1 1> | 122.5 |
Ag (mp-124) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 29.0 |
Bi2Te3 (mp-34202) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 116.0 |
GaSe (mp-1943) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 87.0 |
BN (mp-984) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 87.0 |
BN (mp-984) | <1 0 0> | <0 1 0> | 271.2 |
BN (mp-984) | <1 1 1> | <1 1 1> | 306.3 |
LiNbO3 (mp-3731) | <1 0 0> | <1 1 1> | 306.3 |
MoS2 (mp-1434) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 116.0 |
A full elastic tensor has not been calculated for this material. Registered users can view statistical-learning-based predictions of this material's bulk and shear moduli.
Once you have registered you can also "vote" for full calculation of this material's elastic properties.
material | dissimilarity | Ehull | # of elements |
---|---|---|---|
Li(CoO2)2 (mp-771481) | 0.1716 | 0.136 | 3 |
Li(FeO2)2 (mp-771571) | 0.1154 | 0.665 | 3 |
LiCr2O4 (mp-771523) | 0.1472 | 0.088 | 3 |
Co2RuO4 (mp-767177) | 0.2049 | 0.390 | 3 |
LiTi2O4 (mp-776170) | 0.1745 | 0.042 | 3 |
Li4Mn3Cr5O16 (mp-771517) | 0.1128 | 0.039 | 4 |
Li4Mn5Cr3O16 (mp-772402) | 0.0948 | 0.054 | 4 |
Li2MnCo3O8 (mp-761718) | 0.1103 | 0.131 | 4 |
Li4Mn5Fe3O16 (mp-772481) | 0.1096 | 0.051 | 4 |
Li4Fe5Ni3O16 (mp-771734) | 0.1021 | 0.121 | 4 |
Fe3O4 (mp-715491) | 0.3354 | 0.017 | 2 |
Fe3O4 (mp-542433) | 0.3371 | 0.075 | 2 |
Cr3N4 (mp-1014358) | 0.2922 | 0.226 | 2 |
Fe3O4 (mp-650112) | 0.3139 | 0.060 | 2 |
Fe3O4 (mp-716052) | 0.3456 | 0.781 | 2 |
Li4Cr2Fe3Co3O16 (mp-775698) | 0.0922 | 0.897 | 5 |
Li4Mn3Cr3(FeO8)2 (mp-761449) | 0.1069 | 0.570 | 5 |
Li4Cr3Cu3(SbO8)2 (mp-783908) | 0.1084 | 0.035 | 5 |
Li4Ti3Cr2Fe3O16 (mp-771902) | 0.1113 | 0.088 | 5 |
Li4Mn3Cr2Fe3O16 (mp-849471) | 0.1076 | 0.852 | 5 |
Li3MnFeCo(PO4)3 (mp-764931) | 0.6892 | 0.017 | 6 |
Li3MnFeCo(PO4)3 (mp-764809) | 0.6781 | 0.014 | 6 |
Li3MnFeCo(PO4)3 (mp-764869) | 0.6825 | 0.032 | 6 |
Li3MnFeCo(PO4)3 (mp-764969) | 0.6842 | 0.057 | 6 |
Li3MnFeCo(PO4)3 (mp-764870) | 0.6869 | 0.466 | 6 |
Run TypeGGA+U |
Energy Cutoff520 eV |
# of K-pointsNone |
U ValuesMn: 3.9 eVFe: 5.3 eV Co: 3.32 eV |
PseudopotentialsVASP PAW: Li_sv Mn_pv Fe_pv Co O |
Final Energy/Atom-6.1847 eV |
Corrected Energy-199.1807 eV
Uncorrected energy = -173.1707 eV
Composition-based energy adjustment (-0.687 eV/atom x 16.0 atoms) = -10.9920 eV
Composition-based energy adjustment (-1.668 eV/atom x 2.0 atoms) = -3.3360 eV
Composition-based energy adjustment (-2.256 eV/atom x 3.0 atoms) = -6.7680 eV
Composition-based energy adjustment (-1.638 eV/atom x 3.0 atoms) = -4.9140 eV
Corrected energy = -199.1807 eV
|
Displaying lattice parameters for primitive cell; note that calculated cell volumes are typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%). Note the primitive cell may appear less symmetric than the conventional cell representation (see "Structure Type" selector below the 3d structure)